{"id":366,"date":"2016-07-13T05:57:28","date_gmt":"2016-07-13T05:57:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wordpress.thecongresswatch.com\/2016\/07\/13\/disquiet-in-house-of-reps-over-immunity-bill-for-nass-leaders\/"},"modified":"2021-06-01T15:54:34","modified_gmt":"2021-06-01T15:54:34","slug":"disquiet-in-house-of-reps-over-immunity-bill-for-nass-leaders","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/?p=366","title":{"rendered":"Disquiet in House of Reps over immunity bill for NASS Leaders"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">By Chika Onuorah<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">A bill to give some principal officers of the National Assembly immunity against prosecution is causing disquiet in the House of Representatives.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Only the Executives (President and Vice President, Governors and Deputy Governors) enjoy immunity under section 308 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The house went into a rowdy session as the Minority Leader, Leo Ogor (PDP) attempted a motion on the bill for a second reading. In the process, some members opposed to the bill stood up to halt and commotion ensued<\/span><!--more--><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<\/p><p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Leading the lawmakers opposed to the bill, House Majority Leader, Femi Gbajabiamila (APC) said the timing of the legislation is not right: &#8220;We must feel the pulse of the people; there is something about timing, timing in any piece of legislation is important.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">He also explained that no legislation in the world provides immunity for its presiding officers. Moreover, he drew the attention of his colleagues to the ongoing trial of some principal officers of the Senate, as this may be misconstrued as trying to shield them &#8211; \u201cthere are issues in the senate and I pray it\u2019s resolved.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Ogor had while moving a motion on the bill, said \u201cthe amendment is straight forward but it needs some clear explanation,\u201d adding that: \u201cThe amendment seeks to strengthen the National Assembly, they (leadership) should be protected in the period they are in office.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Speaker, Yakubu Dogara tried to remind his members that any bill(s) that seeks to amend the constitution are normally allowed to pass through the 2nd Reading, before being sent to the adhoc committee on the review of constitution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">But this explanation did not go down well with the anti-immunity lawmakers, as they insisted the bill must be dropped. This further attracted more rowdiness on the floor of the House.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Another moment of calmness returned to the House, allowing the Deputy Chairman, Rules and Business, Ayorinde Olabode to cite order 8 rule 98 of the house rules, which he said was to guide the House. The rule states that any bill that seeks to alter the constitution be sent to a special committee.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">However, the Speaker amidst a noisy House, passed the bill for second reading and referred it to the special committee on constitutional review.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Chika Onuorah A bill to give some principal officers of the National Assembly immunity against prosecution is causing disquiet in the House of Representatives. Only the Executives (President and Vice President, Governors and Deputy Governors) enjoy immunity under section 308 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended). The house went into a rowdy session as [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":488,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-congress-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=366"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":494,"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366\/revisions\/494"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/488"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thecongresswatch.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}